Either that bird’s important, or Mudd is lazy with metaphors.
I suppose if Mudd had a mite of firmness this all could have been averted.
Firmness? Our Harry?
One thing I can say, with admiration, is that Mr. Farinas has kept true to both his own notion of Mudd as the most horrible of critters, and to Harry’s canonical and fanonical depiction as a metaphorical invertebrate who slithers into a situation, works it to his advantage until it becomes apparent that he’s in over is head and is being used for the purposes of those he has fooled himself into believing he’s manipulating.
Click the editor’s note. He mentions a “little bird” giving him the location for their secondary destination.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Notify me of new posts by email.