2017-01-17
‹‹ First ‹ Prev Comments(7) Next › Last ››
Posted on January 17, 2017 by Mark Farinas
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related


7 Responses to 2017-01-17

  1. Ilorin says:
    January 19, 2017 at 8:36 am

    When you have to say “It’s done”, it’s not done.

    Reply
  2. Josh P. says:
    January 18, 2017 at 4:48 pm

    Well, that was easy. Good programing by those Kelvins.

    Reply
  3. Ian says:
    January 17, 2017 at 12:31 pm

    I’m still worried… Nadi claimed it was near impossible to make large lasting changes to the timeline… That history had a way of restoring itself…

    Reply
    • Varcel says:
      January 17, 2017 at 6:58 pm

      Maybe this -is- history restoring itself to what it should be.

      Reply
      • db says:
        January 18, 2017 at 7:52 am

        That’s a good time travel point Varcel.

        Reply
      • Josh P. says:
        January 18, 2017 at 5:01 pm

        That might require the supposedly pointless murder of the American politician, who would have died anyway, somehow resulting in the bad future, which then self corrected through Jin. It’s cool, but it seems far more epic than mere self correction, and far more like a conscious hand than what we get in Oedipus Rex. Besides, we also have hints the self correction of time may be an exaggeration. A change like the one Jin rendered may not be destiny, but instead too big for destiny to overcome.

        I prefer to think the future we see is the one which would happen and Jin overcame what ever protections erected or counted on by the future folk. But, it comes down to the real goal of the story, whether a belief in destiny is the goal, or whether it is showing fighting destiny works.

        Reply
    • DSL says:
      August 1, 2017 at 10:12 am

      Given the “Meh, f*** it, let’s bang” attitude of what we’ve seen of Future Federation, might “Eh, the timeline restores itself” be realistically translated as: “I don’t understand what we’ve gotten hold of, I never have and none of us do and … hey, party!” — the same mindset that leads, as another commenter observed a few comics back, to antique weapons on display behind minimal security in a ready-to-use state?

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

No Good Deed | Weapons of Mass Destruction | Peace in Our Time | Basis of Proof | Time's Refuge


STAR TREK and all related marks are trademark CBS Studios. All illustrations, original characters, and stories are property of Mark Farinas.